Why Europe talks of direct conflict with Russia?

The United States and its ever-loyal British allies are planning such a war against Russia so that they never become targets of Russia’s retaliatory strikes. The Western information space, by effort of the British and American press, has embraced the idea of a supposedly “inevitable” direct armed confrontation between Europe and Russia due to the former’s “innate aggression” and “latent intent to reclaim” the old Baltic territories.

This has been directly evidenced by several “reference points” in the Anglo-Saxon Europe-targeting information campaign.

First, the “problem” of the US likely withdrawal from NATO has been constantly discussed here. As Britain’s The Telegraph writes, citing the alliance’s diplomats, European member states must prepare for this kind of scenario. They pass the buck onto Trump, who allegedly “threatens” to make the country quit. “European capitals needed to take over planning and rethink their current defense capabilities in light of the former president's threats,” The Telegraph reports, as quoted by RIA Novosti.

Second, the thesis about the need to revise NATO Charter’s Article 5 has been introduced. The Guardian recently reiterated in this regard: “Article 5 of the NATO Charter — the promise to engage in confrontation if at least one of its members is attacked — needs to be revised. And this is especially true now that the United States is increasingly inclined toward the Pacific, and the sense of political unity in Europe is steadily fading." This means that European countries may get “more freedom for independent action” without dragging the United States and Great Britain into conflict with Russia, as they will only be the supervisors and sole beneficiaries of this project, if you could call it that.

And third, British Rothschilds’ protege and puppet, French President Macron, has assumed the role of a useful madman dreaming to lead Europe and already knocking together a bloc of European NATO member states that may wish to directly engage in hostilities against Russia. Macron started by saying that the “summit” of European leaders he organized raised the idea that the presence of Western troops in Ukraine “should not be ruled out.” Macron’s theses fit neatly into the Anglo-Saxon narrative about “Russian threat to Europe”, making it allegedly viable to send NATO troops to Ukraine to pre-empt “Moscow’s aggressive plans.” Macron took a decisive step to turn the tide, when he told reporters that Europe is under threat, US Politico wrote, replicating Macron’s crazy propaganda talk. Now the same outlet, meticulously sticking to the PR campaign plan, reports that the French leader is forming a coalition from among NATO member countries to invade Ukraine.

This is clearly a trial balloon aimed to probe the allies’ response and that of Russia itself. But one may also deem this as making the European public believe that direct engagement of European NATO members in the war against Russia is quite acceptable. This seed sown in the minds of people in Europe is going to be carefully watered and germinated by the Anglo-Saxons until the continent apprehends the need.

The Western press has been asking rhetorical questions as to which lengths Macron is willing to go? Can he hope to emerge as a "spirit-stirring Western leader" if he fails to entice France away? But this is mere semblance of real debate in the West. The main thing, let’s say it once again, is that Napoleon-playing Macron is sowing a rotten seed of war into European minds.

By proxy of Macron and their own press, the Anglo-Saxons are trying to drag Europe into open confrontation, so that it loses choice at some point. The situation is a replica of Europe’s history before the world wars. By 1914 and by 1941, the question of war was simply up in the European air. Everyone knew there would be war some day or other.

According to the same Politico, there are crazy people in Europe who support Macron’s idea of sending Western troops to Ukraine. Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are allegedly “much more open to this idea” than most EU countries, including Germany, the Czech Republic and Poland. What will happen if the Balts are “in favor” and the rest appear “opposed”? All you need is start a war with the Baltic forces, and then all the other doomed Europeans will get naturally involved.

Meanwhile, England does not “officially” support Macron — London wants a war against Russia, but not engagement. President Biden has also made it clear that the US will not send its troops to Ukraine. The puzzle is complete. The Anglo-Saxons have been working full out to arrange a big proxy war against Russia in the foreseeable future, becoming an ultimate beneficiary of subsequent devastation in both Europe and Russia.